Peter Attia· MD
the problem is the frequency with which you have to do it is staggering because the half-life of these particles is you know a matter of days so these patients would undergo a phoresis potentially twice a week
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the problem is the frequency with which you have to do it is staggering because the half-life of these particles is you know a matter of days so these patients would undergo a phoresis potentially twice a week
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you pull out LP little high particles there is event they're not randomised binded trials because how did you do that with apheresis that a phoresis for the non for it's a dialysis where you're clearing your blood of you take the blood out you get rid of the LDL particles and you give the residual blood back so and for at least so a week or two they have less