Paul Saladino· MD
there was no more than 50 cases of macular degeneration in all the world's literature
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there was no more than 50 cases of macular degeneration in all the world's literature
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there were no more than about 50 cases of macular degeneration in all the world's literature between 1851 when when the retina was first visible because of the invention of the ophthalmoscope in 1930 1920 or 30. in in that roughly 80-year period there were no more than 50 cases of AMD in the all the world's literature and most all of those came in the 20th century there was just a handful of cases literally in the 19th century