The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the party line has been that and you'll hear pediatricians around the country telling their patients this when asked about vaccine they're kind of reiterating what cdc says which is the risk of myocarditis in young people is exceeded from a vaccine is exceeded by the risk of natural covet infection causing myocarditis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And, you know, we do know about the adverse effects that are occurring like the myocarditis that is happening, you know, in some young people.
It's still quite rare. It does occur. And, again, as Roger mentioned, it's happening six-fold higher in younger healthy individuals than it is in the same individuals that are being exposed to the COVID-19 vaccines.