Paul Saladino· MD
there is good evidence that gi glycemic index and glycemic load are not very good predictors and therefore post perennial blood sugars not a great predictor of cardiovascular health or disease long term
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is good evidence that gi glycemic index and glycemic load are not very good predictors and therefore post perennial blood sugars not a great predictor of cardiovascular health or disease long term
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
glycemic index glycemic load these indicators of how fast your blood sugar Rises or how fast your blood sugar might rise based on the quantity of food you're eating are really bad predictors of cardiovascular outcomes