Peter Attia· MD
we took animals and we gave it this uricase inhibitor to raise the uric acid of an animal and by gosh they developed high blood pressure and then we could lower the blood pressure by lowering the uric acid
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we took animals and we gave it this uricase inhibitor to raise the uric acid of an animal and by gosh they developed high blood pressure and then we could lower the blood pressure by lowering the uric acid
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we did some studies and we found that when we raised uric acid in animals that they developed high blood pressure