The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's called polygenic hypercholesterolemia that sometimes is so severe the polygenic hyperglycemia that it looks a lot like heterozygous FH and some people even say if you've had those genes also from birth onwards and you've had a high LDL cholesterol you know from a young age the risk of that severe polygenic hypercalemia is just the same as for heterozygous FH
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.