Rhonda Patrick· PhD
two to three days of exercise over a lifetime had no effect at all it did not protect against that aging effect
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
two to three days of exercise over a lifetime had no effect at all it did not protect against that aging effect
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when we compared the seniors to the healthy young individuals we notice that not only did the heart shrink but it stiffened
what they found was that the people who exercised one to two days per week pretty much had hearts with the same structure as sedentary adults so one and two days per week provided zero protection basically against heart aging