The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So myocardial infarction was defined clinically as most things were and not pathophysiologically until recently. It was defined by the constellation of things that still I think make up most of the definition, which is chastity. chest pain changes in the electrocardiogram and presence of biomarkers.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
It was defined by the constellation of things that still I think make up most of the definition, which is chastity. chest pain changes in the electrocardiogram and presence of biomarkers.