The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that is the more effective you are at the integrated process of not only picking up the cholesterol via efflux but effectively returning the cholesterol to the liver for excretion the more you would protect against atherosclerosis as the theory goes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
this process of reverse cholesterol transport plausibly and I think some data at least in animal models is related to protection against atherosclerosis