The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I do subacromial decompressions I've done them and I probably will still do them because I ia yet the science that's a reasonable study of randomizing patients and finding that much of a difference and so and these studies have been done with an S better did the patients get do you recall what the absolute improvement I don't know the absolute improvements I don't recall cuz that's the other thing that kind of has to be weighed into these things
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.