The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I want to actually see if I can get a broad-based study of people who happen to already have high HDL low triglycerides and high LDL and see if they have high rates of not only cardiovascular disease but I'll cut again I come back to the FH patients you can't find a more broader demographic of people in terms of variable genetic inputs that produce a phenotype similar to what you're looking at
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
don't give me genetic data don't get me drugged data I'd like just normal non drug non-genetic stratified people preferably and I'd like to stratify just on those three just on HD ll