We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
diet hard hypothesis started in 1913 with a gentleman who fed herbivorous rabbits cholesterol and saw they got atherosclerosis so since then we've been obsessed with cholesterol except rabbits aren't supposed to get cholesterol in their diet because they're herbivores and the atheromas they had don't look like human atheromas at a histological level and rabbits are not humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.