Rhonda Patrick· PhD
so a lifetime of endurance training at a level commen with being a competitive athlete was sufficient to prevent that aspect of cardiovascular aging
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so a lifetime of endurance training at a level commen with being a competitive athlete was sufficient to prevent that aspect of cardiovascular aging
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we didn't change their heart structure at all not even a little bit so once you got to be age 70 it was virtually impossible to change the heart structure
and when we said we looked at the elite athletes their hearts were indistinguishable from healthy 30-year-olds
after the age of 70 it became nearly impossible to reverse the structure of the heart indicating that you know you basically need to do everything that you can before that age to improve the structure of your heart because after that it takes a you know un unsustainable maybe level of exercise to kind of reverse some of those structural changes