The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in addition to me working in the intensive care unit, I also have an outpatient pulmonary clinic. I've diagnosed at least three or four, just off the top of my head, blood clots in patients who went to the hospital, had COVID-19, survived, got better, so they weren't part of the 1%, but then they had persistent shortness of breath, leg swelling. We immediately made the diagnosis and put them on blood thinners.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.