Peter Attia· MD
i think it's like up to 20 50 maybe 10 to 20 in that range if you if you stop training for a month it depends where you're starting though
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think it's like up to 20 50 maybe 10 to 20 in that range if you if you stop training for a month it depends where you're starting though
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that puts a lot of emphasis that sort of points to the idea of really taking care to avoid to to the extent possible obviously to avoid these sort of events because you can actually in the absence of those those events the decline doesn't have to be that steep
if you're well trained for a short period of time you'll lose it quickly if you're if you haven't been training then resting doesn't make any difference and if you're well trained for a long long period of time then you have structural adaptations that are going to take a lot longer to disappear