The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I typical pattern recognition might be a physio might do a slump test which is you straighten one leg and you flex the spine and net but the net stress in the middle of the cord is zero you're pulling it one way you're pulling it the other way it just goes into a little bit of tension if that's a taroff cyst that won't be triggered
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
another one is you know I know a lot of our medical colleagues say well a tarof cyst a neural cyst well they don't cause pain really I will prove to you very quickly whether or not that's causing pain by pulling the nerve root one way or the other