We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
one of the biggest problems with those studies is you know they're two years which is a really long time for a randomized control trial but when you're talking about a disease that is a a lifetime exposure two years in people that are in their 40s I mean you're just not going to have that many incidences to pick up on
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
one of the biggest problems with those studies is you know they're two years which is a really long time for a randomized control trial but when you're talking about a disease that is a lifetime exposure two years in people that are in their 40s I mean you're just not going to have that many incidences to pick up on