The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what makes our blood red is actually the iron that's contained within it so what you can actually do is you can take all the blood that's let's say flowing to a particular organ like the head so anything that's flowing up and you say okay I'm gonna actually excite anything going up north to the brain and so therefore that's arteries and so then you'll actually get to see all the exquisite arteries in your brain just by exciting that blood
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.