Paul Saladino· MD
generally pattern B is the atherogenic pattern type but many people will say simply a high particle counters atherogenic but I think as Paul said you know it's not clear that that's really the case
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
generally pattern B is the atherogenic pattern type but many people will say simply a high particle counters atherogenic but I think as Paul said you know it's not clear that that's really the case
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you have low LDL but a high particle count that's generally considered more atherogenic than not