Peter Attia· MD
when i have a 70 year old patient whose calcium score is 50 it's sort of like so what like you're you're normal it that doesn't tell me much
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when i have a 70 year old patient whose calcium score is 50 it's sort of like so what like you're you're normal it that doesn't tell me much
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when i have a 70 year old patient whose calcium score is 50 it's sort of like so what like you're you're normal it that doesn't tell me much
the frequency of a positive cornic hon goes up as we age and so does the risk of disease
in the older patient the positive score is not very informative so when I have a 70-year-old patient whose calcium score is 50 it's sort of like so what like you're you're normal it that doesn't tell me much