The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the sacrum is a is basically a single bone it's actually fused so it it at one point it was multiple bones right so so you have this sort of one fused sacrum and then you have these five lumbar discs numbered one through five now between each of those lumbar um vertebral bodies is a disc um and then there's one between the fifth lumbar vertebral body in the uh sacrum so uh we refer to them as you know l3 l4 is the disc between three and four and l5 s1 is the disc between there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.