The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it is relevant to another protein that I think now is a good time to introduce which is another key protein a receptor that is basically the major HDL receptor the essentially the equivalent of the ldar receptor but for HDL and it's known as srb1
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The analogy I like to use Peter is that of garbage trucks so a very simplistic view of HDL which we're going to return to because it's much more nuanced is that HDL to a certain extent functions like garbage trucks that are picking up things trash in places where you don't want it and returning it to the liver dumping it off via sob1 and then going back now empty to do more of its role again
srb1 is a receptor that basically is on a lot of cells but the liver is the most important with regard to HDL and it essentially binds the HDL particle basically sucks the cholesterol Ester out of the HDL particle and then releases the cholesterol depleted HDL back into the circulation to go back around and do whatever it's doing