The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for whatever reason arteries are able to retain ldls you know you like you said you have 1600 particles floating around on your arterial side venous side they're small enough where they can get in everywhere but for whatever reason the proteoglycans the glycocalx the the macrophages what have you for whatever reason the arteries decide to retain it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are proteoglycans in the sub-intominal space in a vein as well we know that if you put a vein into the arterial circulation it can retain LDL so there's there's no reason that a vein couldn't retain that LDL it has proteoglycans in the sub-intominal space just like an artery does
once you put it on the arterial side the signaling the chemical signaling the cytokines what have you that's probably part of the equation