We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
for example the pcsk9 hyper functions somehow having toxic endothelium reactions in response to this inability or impaired ability to take up cholesterol despite there being no evidence of that being true because there's no evidence that pcsk9 hyper functioning patients use an LDL receptor to take up cholesterol into their endothelial cells
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.