The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
You can look at a carotid intima-media thickness test, which is ultrasound of your neck of on your arteries or your artery on the side of your neck. If there's thickening of that artery, you have inflammation in the artery, or you have soft plaque in the artery, whatever's going on there is very likely going on in your coronary arteries as well.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and you can start if you understand why they move and what they do it'll start to tell you what's going on with the vasculature and your risk with cardiovascular disease and what's going on because the studies are not so clear that LDL just like if your LDL is high then it's cardiovascular disease and when they look at things like coronary aity calcium scores and cored intimal medial thickness test which is an ultrasound of the cored arteries you start to see that LDL values are not correlated if some of those things are completely fine like if CAC is zero and so those are other metrics you can check is CAC and C IMT