The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the aneurysm had ruptured and i was bleeding out into my abdomen and of course i didn't know this and i was in the woods with my wife and um she dragged me back out of the woods uh me sort of stumbling and got me to the driveway and put me in the car so i could sit down and and i started to go blind
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what had happened was the artery the aneurysm had ruptured and i was bleeding out into my abdomen and of course i didn't know this