The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we want to then take a scan of everybody we're flying everyone to UCLA to the list Institute where they will take a CT angiogram of their cardiovascular system they then head home and a year later they come back we do another scan and then we can do a comparison data analysis against both of those scans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think that it's a great study to see clearly will we see progression accelerated progression of atherosclerosis in people who are metabolically healthy and have a quote elevated LDL that has increased more than 50% with a dietary change