The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's plenty of scientific evidence to suggest that cell phone radiation emfs electromagnetic fields coming off of cell phones are harmful for fertility for men that's predominantly where it's been studied in men there's a systematic review that was published a few years ago showing that cell phone radiation is clearly associated with lower testosterone in men
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.