The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's basically saying if you took four snapshots in a room and how many people had blue shirts on and how many people had red shirts on and you saw the deltas you could not infer the actual numbers that went in and out but just the net Delta so there is either a net influx or a flux of people in blue shirts or red shirts right that's the best we can do
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.