Peter Attia· MD
CAC helpful but it’s one piece of the Bayesian puzzle.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
CAC helpful but it’s one piece of the Bayesian puzzle.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if there is still uncertainty about risk even after you estimate tenure risk and consider those risk enhancing factors you can get a coronary artery calcium score to help refine risk a little bit better and guide share decision making things