Paul Saladino· MD
they took their saturated fat intake down from 23 percent down to like 10 or something like you know somewhere around 10 percent
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they took their saturated fat intake down from 23 percent down to like 10 or something like you know somewhere around 10 percent
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's the Finland trial or the North Carolina Finland where they had the highest mortality rates in the 1970s cardiovascular mortality in North Carolina Finland was there was 100 people 700 people dying for every 100 000 people