The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, the the CAC, the coronary artery calcium score only tells us calcified plaque. And then the clearly in the CTIO can tell us non-calified plaque. Correct. It's going to give you non-calcified plaque. It's going to give you percent blockage of the blood vessels, right? This is the other thing you don't get from the CAC
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.