The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So through the tip of that catheter, there's a little plastic one-way valve and you can thread things in. You can thread in other plastic catheters. So in this case, you thread in a regular coronary catheter, which I think is like two millimeters. You thread that in. You can then, under x-ray guidance, with a wire to make it a little stiffer, guide it all the way up around the arch of the aorta and back down. Back down to the base of the heart where the coronary ostea are.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.