We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the LP little a mass is directionally a reasonable test but it's not a great test and the reason is it's measuring for particles that carry a PO a it's measuring the mass of everything which is the a PO a the a PO be the phospholipids the cholesterol the triglycerides the dog's the cats through whatever it's measuring the mass of the entire structure
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that again in isolation is not very helpful I am NOT an expert in clinical chemistry but I've spoken with people who are and it turns out there are some other technical issues with that test that renders it not entirely helpful and also misleading in its own way under certain circumstances