The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
As an example of where we would be able to use this, if you're looking at exercise epidemiology or nutrition epidemiology, um you might not be able to answer the meta question with epidemiology, but you could do short-term well-controlled studies to show that for example like you know 6 months of exercise improved blood pressure.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.