The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
now you can do the prostate biopsy one of two ways one way is to to again pass the needle right alongside the um ultrasound probe that's a transrectal biopsy that um then you you can follow the track of the needle as it goes in alongside the ultrasound probe through the rectal mucosa into the prostate it's a very effective way to pick up prostate Cancers and the trial I talked about that's the Stockholm 3 trial that's the technique that they used
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so what we typically do is we take the MRI images and you either cognitively IE with your brain or with a computer assistance overlay the MRI and the suspicious area on the MRI with the real time ultrasound