The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so in 2008 or 2009 when I was in my mid-30s I had my first calcium skin now at the time my doctor thought this was a crazy idea I was 35 I was exercising at least 24 hours a week um there's was no seemingly relevant reason for me to waste insurance money and do this um but I had a horrible family history
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.