Peter Attia· MD
if you have a negative MRI and a in a high PSA density you we will often suggest a biopsy for you
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
if you have a negative MRI and a in a high PSA density you we will often suggest a biopsy for you
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if your MRI shows um no lesion but a high PSA density so a young man let's say under 60 that's a PSA density of more than 0.1 or 0.12 yep if you're older I'll give you a little bit more of a Le longer leash and we'll say 0.15 over 65 or 70
if you have a PSA density that's below that threshold and you have a high PSA low percent free Etc you need a biopsy in my opinion
if your MRI shows um no lesion but a high PSA density so a young man let's say under 60 that's a PSA density of more than 0.1 or 0.12 yep if you're older I'll give you a little bit more of a Le longer leash and we'll say 0.15 over 65 or 70