The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you fill the heart less with blood um you don't stretch the muscles out that's called preload so the heart needs to be preloaded with lots of blood volume so it can get a good squeeze and anything that prevents that either dehydration or literally forces that are preventing the blood returning to the heart could make you know make that high heart rate really a product of tiny tiny little uh ineffective beats yes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when you fill the heart less with blood um you don't stretch the muscles out that's called preload so the heart needs to be preloaded with lots of blood volume so it can get a good squeeze and anything that prevents that either dehydration or literally forces that are preventing the blood returning to the heart could make you know make that high heart rate really a product of tiny tiny little uh ineffective beats