Peter Attia· MD
but in a situation where our LDL receptors are not that active anymore adding cholesterol to LDL is not a very good idea
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but in a situation where our LDL receptors are not that active anymore adding cholesterol to LDL is not a very good idea
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
which in the days of very active ldr receptor activity was a great idea because then all the cholesterol went back to the liver and a cholesterol molecule is very expensive to make it costs 2780ps in a nasty environment like the Ice Age you want to conserve that molecule and the best way of conserving your cholesterol is by sending it back to the liver