The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you've probably seen examples too, where, I mean, I remember again, as a cardiology fellow, maybe even as a resident where, you know, somebody would come in from an outside hospital, sick as shit, just absolutely on death's door. And all we did was just turn off everything and the patient got better because they were just overmanaged.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.