The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but perhaps the best use of a DMAs DMA is in the primary prevention setting where you got a little borderline april-b leop you're not gonna do lifestyle do I really want to throw you on a drug or something if those markers are up that tells me whatever is going on in you you have endothelial dysfunction so you're down the road towards the vascular pathology so it might be a marker to kick you in the rear to at least be super aggressive nutritionally
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
even hey I'm sorry of whatever nutrition we tried you still have abnormal endothelial function it's time for us to hear I would rather improve these markers that will take a drug to get them to where I want them to be so maybe we can use it in that setting