Peter Attia· MD
even a calcium score of 6 to 10 if you're 60 years old would be considered quite low
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
even a calcium score of 6 to 10 if you're 60 years old would be considered quite low
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and you find they've got a calcium score of 10 which again this is not a person who's going to die anytime soon but they've already progress to a calcium score of 10 you know this is a person who might be in their 40s so this is a person who's actually on the path towards premature atherosclerosis