The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's two counting issues there just to clarify right zubin the first is you have a negative selection for patients and then you have a underestimation of the denominator that's right so in other words we don't know how many people got infected with covid out in the community that did just fine we're guessing at that or using incomplete tools and so that's part of the problem in the calculations
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.