The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in my case because your vessels are nice and elastic so you know as it receives the bolus of blood everything expands and then when it when the air valve shuts then those vessels they rebound a little bit and and they keep the take this sort of pulse tile bolus flow and turn it to more of a laminar less bolus flow so that elasticity of the vessels are super important
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.