The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
well if you look at the eyelids of patients with graves disease where they retract you look at that chronic contracted eyelid it's the same exact signaling proteins so who is to say that this relationship between a chronically contracted scalp getting pulled down tightly creating tension across the top of the scalp might not be doing the same thing in pattern baldness
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.