The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if the endothelium gets damaged and in this AMA we're gonna talk about a lot of things that damaged endothelium the endothelium is the inner lining of our blood vessels so the inner lining of arteries and veins which have a glycocalyx kind of forest proteoglycans sticking up from them and if the endothelium gets damaged it appears that these endothelial stem cells these endothelial progenitor cells can come along and stick themselves onto that damaged spot
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Malcolm Kendrick also talked about these endothelial progenitor cells that can circulate and in the blood and then attach to the endothelium and kind of sandwich onto the top of an athletic lesion or a damaged arterial wall