The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The reason I do it most of the time is because if there's significant arthritis there and I'm there I'm too afraid that they're going to have pain after because a lot of people after new replacement still are 85% satisfaction means that 15% are dissatisfied and if I haven't replaced the patella I'm thinking to myself maybe I should have replaced the patella too
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.