The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's a mechanical side physiologically it's telling us how well you're tolerating the rising co2 because you're actually going so slow that there's more co2 still accumulating than air getting out right psychologically we're finding out where that suffocation false alarm system is which is a real thing we all have that suffocation false alarm
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.