Paul Saladino· MD
the last one I got was two Millers which is I want to say around two-thirds of what a free living year would be right
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the last one I got was two Millers which is I want to say around two-thirds of what a free living year would be right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but a CT angiogram depending on the institution, you know it's going to be you know probably a little shy of 8 to 10 millisieverts, but that's much less than you know a a nuclear stress test. You know a nuclear stress test is going to be 20 plus millisieverts.
So like a calcium score test is I believe about approximately like you know 10 chest x-rays.
today the really fast scanners the the best of the best scanners are somewhere between one and three milliseverts for that same procedure